?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Looking at CNN.com tonight, I saw this story, Netflix wants to shut Blockbuster online rentals. So I was intrigued, so I started to read it.

Well its another patent infringement suit, but this one I think has merit where as the one against RIM did not. The lawsuit says Blockbuster was aware that Netflix had obtained a patent for its business method and was seeking a second, but willfully and deliberately violated the existing patent when it launched its online rental service in 2004.

Now part of me says that this is just a way to stop your competition, but at the same time if the US patent office issued a 2 patents for this stuff, and Blockbuster went ahead with there site despite it, then that is another thing. Now the major difference here is that Netflix's is not a patent squatting company where as NTP was. This might be one of the first, major, ground breaking patent lawsuits of our generation and of the internet age it's self.

But also, I can’t help but wonder had the first video store filed a patent about people walking into there store to "rent" videos and take them home with them, could they have sued anyone else that tried to copy there idea? Would the government have even given a patent for that idea? Which in theory is not much different then what has happened here. Or could LiveJournal.com patented the idea of giving people a place to write a "blog" and then post it using there service, could they sue anyone else who tired this idea? I have no clue, but part of me says no, but then again I really do have no clue.

I think this will be a case to watch, and see what the outcome is. I also wonder as this case gets going, how many people will leave blockbuster, cus they are worried about the service getting shut down. Like I said, if you can’t beat them (or just don’t want to), then shut them down...

Comments

( 1 Person Thought — Tell Me What You Think )
(Anonymous)
Apr. 5th, 2006 07:45 am (UTC)
Litigation
Interesting post. Another thing to consider: The article states that Blockbuster only has 1 million subscribers to its online service vs. 4 million at Netflix. Plus, Blockbuster has cut way back on marketing its service. Doesn't sound like much of a threat, does it? But, if Netflix doesn't take a strong stand against this challenge to their business model, soon everyone else will be lining up to try to get a piece of the action, and that would be really difficult to defend. Plus, it would give other companies an action to claim that Netflix wasn't defending its patents against Blockbuster, therefore, they deserve to be able to do this, too. Netflix basically has no choice but to defend this vigorously. But yes, it does make you wonder if the patents were proper to begin with. Keep us posted on this one.

Mom
( 1 Person Thought — Tell Me What You Think )

Profile

keyword-288
claystorm
Kevin Murray

Latest Month

June 2019
S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Other

Page Summary

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow